Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 3-8
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing staccato dots in PE must be an oversight, probably by the engraver – the marks are in all 5 repetitions of this bar. The dots were added in GE, which we include in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE |
||||||||||
|
b. 36
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
The missing staccato dot under the bass note in the first impressions of PE must be an oversight (in this and the next bar). Relevant marks are present in analogous figures both before (bars 33-35) and after (bar 38). In the main text we add a dot in both places, as it was performed in GE and PE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
||||||||||
|
b. 37
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
As in the previous bar, the missing staccato dot in the first impressions of PE must be an oversight. In the main text we add it, as it was performed in GE and PE4. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
||||||||||
|
b. 54
|
composition: WN 29, Waltz in E minor
..
In PE1 the treble clef is placed before the 1st L.H. crotchet. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and PE2 (→PE3→PE4). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors in PE , |
in 
mark in such a harmonic, dynamic and pianistic context most probably means that the pedal should be held until the very end of the passage, which we specify in the main text with the help of a [
